Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Anderson

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 1963No. 9854PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HENRIOD, Chief Justice.

Appeal from a judgment that an escrow agreement relating to a land transfer violated the rule against perpetuities. Reversed with costs to appellant.

A deed was deposited with a bank, which, under the agreement, calling for a $26,500 purchase price, would be delivered to the buyer upon performance of all conditions set forth therein. The condition precipitating this litigation is that relating- to amount and time of payment, and reads as follows:

“$500. May 1, 1959; $500, Dec. 1, 1959; $1,000, Oct. 1, 1960; $1,000 each Oct. 1 thereafter until the full purchase price with…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Craig v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Hart v. BarronMontana Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Waldock v. Frisco Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Coulter & Smith, Ltd. v. RussellUtah Supreme Court · 1998
  2. DOXEY-LAYTON COMPANY v. ClarkUtah Supreme Court · 1976
  3. DOXEY-LAYTON COMPANY v. ClarkUtah Supreme Court · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API