Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Palmer v. Del Webb's High Sierra

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided September 1, 1992No. 20338Published

1ConcurrenceYoung, J.

I concur with the majority’s result but cannot agree with its reasoning. I therefore write separately.

The issue presented by this appeal is whether a lung disease caused by secondhand tobacco smoke is covered by NODA.1 To resolve this issue, however, this court must decide whether com-pensable occupational diseases are restricted to those specifically listed in NODA.

Facts

For over twenty years, Palmer was employed at Del Webb’s High Sierra Casino (“High Sierra”) as a “pit boss.” His job required that he supervise gaming tables from an area in the casino referred to as the “pit.” The pit area…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Guiseppi v. WallingCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
  3. Hansen v. Harrah'sNevada Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State Employment Security Department v. Hilton Hotels Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 1986
  5. William McKinney v. Pat Anderson Carol Ployer H.L. Whitley George W. Sumner John NyeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API