Legal Opinion
Flynn v. Goldman, Sachs & Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 8, 1993No. 91 Civ. 0035 (KMW)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KIMBA M. WOOD, District Justice.
Joanne Flynn claims that her former employer, Goldman, Sachs & Co., discriminated against her because of her sex by(1) failing to promote her to the position of Manager of Training and Development;(2) failing to name her to the position of Manager of Sales Training as of December 13, 1988;(3) terminating her; and(4) giving her a severance package inferior to that of similarly situated male employees,
in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. and the New York Human Rights Law (“NYHRL”),…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Hazen Paper Co. v. BigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Joseph E. Dister v. The Continental Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re Vivendi Universal, S.A. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- In Re New York Asbestos LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- Roman v. Cornell UniversityDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1999
- Querry v. MessarDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Binder v. Long Island Lighting Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.