Legal Opinion

Henry v. Sanderson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1932No. Docket No. 216, Calendar No. 36,722PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.

This case arises out of an automobile accident which occurred at the intersection of two highways. Plaintiff had judgment,' and the sole question presented for review is appellant’s claim that the trial court should have directed a verdict against plaintiff on the ground that he was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law.

Both the question of defendant’s negligence and plaintiff’s contributory negligence were submitted to the jury. In appellant’s brief his negligence is admitted. In reviewing the question presented, we must accept the version of all controverted facts which, is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Swainston v. KennedyMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Lefevre v. RobertsMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Pline v. ParsonsMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Kiefer v. FinkMichigan Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Churukian v. LaGestMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Gallagher v. WalterMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Ehrke v. DanekMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Parker v. EnglandMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Churukian v. LaGestMichigan Supreme Court · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API