Legal Opinion

S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc. v. Town of Caledonia

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided October 23, 1996No. 95-2700PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNettesheim, J.

The issue on appeal is whether a property owner may challenge a real estate property tax assessment by commencing a de novo action in the circuit court pursuant to § 74.37(3)(d), Stats. Rejecting the Town of Caledonia's argument that the property owner, S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc., was limited to a certiorari review proceeding pursuant to § 70.47(13), Stats., the circuit court held that a de novo action was permitted.

The circuit court also rejected the Town's alternative argument that the de novo procedure violated the uniformity of taxation clause of the Wisconsin Constitution, art. VIII, § 1.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Johnson v. CadyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Associated Hospital Service, Inc. v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Fulton Foundation v. Department of TaxationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Scheunemann v. City of West BendCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1993
  5. Servonitz v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Nankin v. Village of ShorewoodWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Silver Lake Sanitary District v. Wisconsin Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1999
  3. Metropolitan Associates v. City of MilwaukeeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2009
  4. Nankin v. Village of ShorewoodWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Nankin v. Village of ShorewoodWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API