S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc. v. Town of Caledonia
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtNettesheim, J.
The issue on appeal is whether a property owner may challenge a real estate property tax assessment by commencing a de novo action in the circuit court pursuant to § 74.37(3)(d), Stats. Rejecting the Town of Caledonia's argument that the property owner, S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc., was limited to a certiorari review proceeding pursuant to § 70.47(13), Stats., the circuit court held that a de novo action was permitted.
The circuit court also rejected the Town's alternative argument that the de novo procedure violated the uniformity of taxation clause of the Wisconsin Constitution, art. VIII, § 1.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Johnson v. CadyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
- Associated Hospital Service, Inc. v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
- Fulton Foundation v. Department of TaxationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
- Scheunemann v. City of West BendCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1993
- Servonitz v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Nankin v. Village of ShorewoodWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
- Silver Lake Sanitary District v. Wisconsin Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1999
- Metropolitan Associates v. City of MilwaukeeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2009
- Nankin v. Village of ShorewoodWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
- Nankin v. Village of ShorewoodWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.