Legal Opinion

Ramiller v. Ramiller

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 8, 1945No. 46660PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBliss, J.

The pleadings are of considerable length, but, because of our conclusions and decision, reference to much of them may be omitted. There is no controversy between the plaintiffs and the defendant widow. The petition alleged that Weinrich claimed some right in the land because of his mortgage thereon and promissory note secured by it, both executed by Edward W. Ramiller, deceased, and his wife, the defendant, Emma Ramiller, but it is also alleged that plaintiffs believe the note was paid by decedent, and, if it was not paid, action to recover thereon is barred by the statute of limitations and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Newgirg v. BlackSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  2. Hootman v. BeattySupreme Court of Iowa · 1940
  3. Monast v. ManleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1940
  4. Lackey v. MelcherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1938
  5. Newton v. KnoxSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Jennings v. SchmitzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1945
  2. State v. DuncanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Locken v. LockenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Willow Tree Investments, Inc. v. WilhelmSupreme Court of Iowa · 1991
  5. Vossen v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API