Legal Opinion

Ferencz v. Milie

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 23, 1987No. 31 W.D. Appeal Docket 1987PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

PAPADAKOS, Justice.

Appellant, Florence Ferencz, filed suit in both trespass and assumpsit against Appellee, Attorney Robert J. Milie, in the Court of Common Pleas of Westmoreland County. She sought damages for alleged professional negligence and malpractice. At the conclusion of her presentation of evidence to the jury, the trial court (Loughran, J.) granted defendant (Appellee, here) a compulsory non-suit. The Superior Court (Cirillo, P.J., Hoffman and Rosenwald,* JJ.) affirmed in a Memorandum Opinion and Per Curiam Order, 355 Pa.Superior Ct. 638, 509 A.2d 1324 (1986). A…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Carrender v. FittererSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Duke & Co. v. AndersonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. McNally v. LiebowitzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. VANIC Et Ux. v. RagniSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  5. Seng v. American Stores Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Berman v. Radnor Rolls, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Harmotta v. BenderSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Malinder v. Jenkins Elevator & MacHine Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Herr v. BootenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Baran v. Pagnotti Enterprises, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API