Legal Opinion

R.A.F. v. P.M.Z.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 1988No. Civ. No. 870384PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ERICKSTAD, Chief Justice.

R.A.F. (hereinafter “Richard,” a pseudonym) appeals from a district court order requiring him to pay one-half of the attorney’s fees incurred by P.M.Z. (“Patricia,” a pseudonym) in this paternity action. We affirm the order and remand for entry of judgment consistent with this appeal.

On July 6, 1986, 6.M.Z. (“Gregory,” a pseudonym) was bom to Patricia. Richard and Patricia agree that Richard is Gregory’s biological father. On August 25,1986, Richard commenced this action seeking a determination of paternity, custody, and child support. The parties entered into a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. City of Bismarck v. ThomNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Gast Construction Co. v. Brighton PartnershipNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Gillan v. SaffellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Bryan v. MillerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Dvorak v. DvorakNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Heitkamp v. Family Life Services, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Morley v. MorleyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Ryken v. RykenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Ennis v. Williams County Board of CommissionersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  5. J.R. v. Executive DirectorNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API