R.A.F. v. P.M.Z.
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
ERICKSTAD, Chief Justice.
R.A.F. (hereinafter “Richard,” a pseudonym) appeals from a district court order requiring him to pay one-half of the attorney’s fees incurred by P.M.Z. (“Patricia,” a pseudonym) in this paternity action. We affirm the order and remand for entry of judgment consistent with this appeal.
On July 6, 1986, 6.M.Z. (“Gregory,” a pseudonym) was bom to Patricia. Richard and Patricia agree that Richard is Gregory’s biological father. On August 25,1986, Richard commenced this action seeking a determination of paternity, custody, and child support. The parties entered into a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- City of Bismarck v. ThomNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
- Gast Construction Co. v. Brighton PartnershipNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- Gillan v. SaffellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- Bryan v. MillerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1944
- Dvorak v. DvorakNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Heitkamp v. Family Life Services, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Morley v. MorleyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- Ryken v. RykenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- Ennis v. Williams County Board of CommissionersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- J.R. v. Executive DirectorNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.