Legal Opinion

Hendricks v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided February 3, 1923No. A-3928PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatson, P. J.

Plaintiffs in error (hereinafter referred to as defendants) were jointly tried and convicted on January 8, 1921, of the crime of gambling, and the defendants Hendricks and Tiller were each fined the sum oft $50, to which was added imprisonment in the county jail for a period of 10 days. ' The defendant Flinn’s punishment was fixed at a fine of $50. From judgments rendered in conformity with the respective verdicts they prosecute a joint appeal to this court, and assign and rely upon the following alleged errors: (1) That the'verdict is contrary toi the law and, evidence and not sustained by…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Corliss v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1918
  3. Pickrell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
  4. Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1919
  5. Key v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ward v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1924
  2. Gore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. Brower v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. Relf v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1929
  5. Pure Oil Pipe Line Co. v. RossCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API