Legal Opinion

People v. Floyd

California Supreme Court

Decided July 21, 2003No. S105225PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1 Cal.Rptr.3d 885 (2003)

31 Cal.4th 179

72 P.3d 820

The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

Andre Rene FLOYD, Defendant and Appellant.

No. S105225.

Supreme Court of California.

July 21, 2003.

Conrad Petermann, Beverly Hills, under appointment by the Supreme Court, for Defendant and Appellant.

Marylou Hilberg for Tommy Lee Fryman as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Defendant and Appellant.

Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Robert R. Anderson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Jo Graves, Assistant Attorney General, Stan Cross and Patrick J. Whalen, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

BAXTER, J.

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. In Re EstradaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  2. People v. ArandaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Briggs v. Eden Council for Hope & OpportunityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Cooley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  5. People v. FrancisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. ConleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
  2. People v. DiazCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  3. People v. ConleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API