Legal Opinion
Todd v. Aetna Health Plans
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided August 6, 1999No. 97 CV 443(NG)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
GERSHON, District Judge.
Pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1132, plaintiff Maxine Todd seeks review of the denial of her claim for disability benefits under an employee Disability Benefits Plan issued by defendant Citibank, N.A. (“Citibank”) and administered by defendant Aetna Life Insurance Company (“AETNA”) (named here as Aet-na Health Plans). Plaintiff also brings related claims of illegal termination and intentional infliction of emotional distress. Defendants move for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Billinger v. Bell AtlanticDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Armstrong v. LIBERTY MUT. LIFE ASSUR. OF BOSTONDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Winter v. Hartford Life and Accident Ins. Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 2004
- Armstrong v. Liberty Mutual Life Assurance Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2003