Legal Opinion

Alexanderson v. Board of Commissioners

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 4, 1980No. TC 25142 CA 13226 and SC 26628PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*429LINDE, J.

The issue for decision is whether Polk County unlawfully denied petitioner’s application for an otherwise proper partition of his 25-acre tract of land on the ground that the partition would contravene a statewide planning goal promulgated by the Land Conservation and Development Commission ("LCDC”).

The land in question qualifies as agricultural land within the definition of LCDC’s Goal 3, relating to the preservation of such land for agricultural use.1 At the time of the application it was used primarily as cherry orchard and was qualified for property tax assessment limited to farm…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. South of Sunnyside Neighborhood League v. Board of CommissionersOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Jurgenson v. County Court for Union CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Thomas Dodd and Doris Dodd v. Hood River County, an Oregon Municipal Corporation, and State of Oregon, Defendant-Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  2. Thomas Dodd Doris Dodd v. Hood River County, and State of Oregon, Defendant-Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  3. Dodd v. Hood River CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State Housing Council v. City of Lake OswegoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  5. Fisher v. ColwellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API