Legal Opinion
Danielson v. Huether
United States District Court
Decided December 19, 2018No. 4:18-CV-04039-RALPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERTO A. LANGE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Plaintiff Bruce Danielson, proceeding pro se, sued the State of South Dakota, South Dakota's Attorney General Marty Jackley, the City of Sioux Falls, the City's former mayor Mike Huether, and City employees David Pfeifle and Heather Hitterdal (collectively "the Defendants"). Doc. 1. Danielson alleges that the Defendants violated 42 U.S.C. § 1983, the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961 - 1968, and state law. Doc. 1. The Defendants have moved to dismiss all of Danielson's claims under Rule 12(b)(6) of the…
2Cases cited84 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Sapienza v. Liberty Mut. Fire Ins. Co.United States District Court · 2019
- Boudreau v. PetitDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2024
- Daniel Lipsky v. Martin J. Jackley, in his individual capacity as the Attorney General of the State of South Dakota; Thomas Denny Sanford, Sanford Health, a non-profit private corporation; First Premier Bank, a for-profit private corporation; Federal Judge Lawrence Piersol, in individual capacity; Federal Judge Camilla Theeler, in individual capacity; Federal Judge Eric Schulte, in individual capacity; and John and Jane Doe 1-12, currently unknown possible co-defendants.District Court, D. South Dakota · 2026
- Engel v. EngelDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2022
- Healy v. FoxDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2021
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.