Legal Opinion

Reed v. Union Planters National Bank of Memphis

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided May 25, 1971PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MATHERNE, Judge.

The single question presented on this appeal is whether or not executor’s commission and fees to executor’s attorney should be paid from the estate of Thomas A. Cu-neo for services rendered by them in connection with a lawsuit styled Reed v. Robilio, Action No. 4404 filed in the District Court of the United States of America for the Western District of Tennessee.

The Probate Court of Shelby County Tennessee allowed the fees as a charge against the estate, and Martha Cuneo Reed, the sole beneficiary of the estate, appeals assigning that action as error.

As related to the present…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smith v. HaireTennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Lassiter v. TravisTennessee Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Reed v. RobilioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1967
  4. Reed v. RobilioDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1967

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Wallace v. CollierCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1992
  2. Estate of Ladd v. MarksCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2007
  3. McFarlin v. McFarlinCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1989
  4. Wildasin v. MathesDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2016
  5. Craig v. Gabbert, Jr., L. Glenn Worley And M. Kimberly Stagg OfCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API