Shirk v. Caterbone
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Flood, J.,
In this case the appellee moved to quash the appeal because the appellant failed to file his brief or record at the time required by the rules of this court. The appellant filed his brief, but he has not yet filed the printed record nor has he filed a petition under Rule 52 to be excused from doing so or alleged any valid excuse for his failure to do so. He states in his answer to the petition to quash that the appellee is familiar with the papers filed of record. However, this furnishes no excuse, since the requirement of printing the record is for the benefit of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Windom National Bank v. KleinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
- Northampton Brewery Corp. v. LandeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Wiseman v. MartoranoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
3Cited by8 opinions
- City of Arkansas City v. AndersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1988
- Ellis v. EllisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Pleet v. Valley Greene AssociatesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Matter of Dutch Inn of Orlando, Ltd.United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 1980
- Buckman v. GoldblattOhio Court of Appeals · 1974
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.