Legal Opinion
Carr v. Yokohama Specie Bank, Limited, of San Francisco
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 14, 1952No. 13156_1Published
1Opinion of the Court
200 F.2d 251
CARR
v.
YOKOHAMA SPECIE BANK, LIMITED, OF SAN FRANCISCO et al.
No. 13156.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
November 14, 1952.
Louis J. Glicksberg, San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.
S. M. Saroyan, Shirley, Saroyan, Calvert & Barbagelata, San Francisco, Cal., for appellees Yokohama Specie Bank et al.
Harold I. Baynton, Asst. Atty. Gen., Chauncey F. Tramutolo, U. S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., Valentine C. Hammack, Percy Barshay, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., P. Richard Cosway and Mary Eschweiler, Attorneys, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., for appellee J. Howard McGrath.
Before…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Propper v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Beeler v. American Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
- Hansen v. Bear Film Co.California Supreme Court · 1946
- Stromerson v. AverillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Schilling v. Schwitzer-Cummins Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.