Legal Opinion

Watkins Company v. Dutt

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1969No. File 10638PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WUEST, Circuit Judge.

This is an action by the plaintiff against defendant, Dutt, for merchandise purchased, and defendants, Roy and Adeline Swingler, as sureties guaranteeing payment. The plaintiff is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business at Winona, Minnesota. Defendants are residents of South Dakota.

Prior to August 30, 1965, plaintiff was not licensed to transact business in South Dakota, as provided by SDC 11.21. A purchase and surety agreement was executed by the parties in November 1962 at Winona, Minnesota. Between November 29, 1962 and April 20, 1965, plaintiff…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. International Textbook Co. v. PiggSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. Sioux Remedy Co. v. CopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Eli Lilly & Co. v. Sav-On-Drugs, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Furst & Thomas v. BrewsterSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. Marcus v. JR Watkins CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1966

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Satellite Cable Services, Inc. v. Northern Electric Cooperative, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Glanzer v. St. Joseph Indian SchoolSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Hoffman v. Louis Dreyfus Corp.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Kasselder v. KappermanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Southard v. HansenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API