Legal Opinion

United States v. Dinome

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 11, 1996No. 586, Docket 94-1476PublishedCited by 86 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAHONEY, Circuit Judge:

Defendant-appellant Wayne Heilman appeals from an amended judgment entered August 22, 1994 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Miriam Goldman Cedarbaum, Judge, upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of one count of mail fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1341,1 and one count of wire fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343,2 for making false statements in connection with an application for a residential mortgage.

On appeal, Heilman claims that the district court improperly instructed the jury that mail and wire fraud may be established…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. McNally v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Carpenter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Marc J. Anderson & Jeffrey E. Grubb v. Dennis Branen, Ross Kindestin, Ed WisniefskiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  5. United States v. Frank Locascio, and John GottiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by86 opinions

  1. United States v. Carlos GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  2. United States v. David S. BokCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  3. United States v. BindayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
  4. United States v. James M. Gabriel, Gerard E. VittiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
  5. United States v. FergusonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011

81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API