Legal Opinion
Dycus v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 20, 1998No. 96-2146PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LOGAN, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs appeal the district court’s judgment affirming a decision by defendant Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) denying plaintiffs’ request for certain pension benefits. 1 Plaintiffs, hourly employees at a potash mine formerly owned by Potash Company of America (PCA), brought this action under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1461, claiming entitlement to early retirement benefits due to an alleged permanent shutdown of the mine.
I
On December 1,1985, the potash mine was shut down purportedly only temporarily until January…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Don Olenhouse v. Commodity Credit CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- A. O. Smith Corp. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- Pat S. BRANDIS, Et Al., Appellants, v. KAISER ALUMINUM & CHEMICAL CORPORATION, Et Al., AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- Texas Employment Commission v. E-Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hodges v. Life Ins. Co. of N. Am., Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- Vanderkam v. Pension Benefit Guaranty CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- United Steel, Paper & Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial & Service Workers International Union v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Davis v. Pension Benefit Guaranty CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Ingram v. International Broth. of Elec. Workers, Local 2021Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.