Legal Opinion
437 Madison Avenue Associates v. A. T. Kearney, Inc.
Civil Court of the City of New York
Decided September 1, 1983PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Charles E. Ramos, J.
By reason of the present real estate market conditions prevalent in Manhattan’s central business district, commercial tenants are increasingly holding over past the expiration dates of their leases as they attempt to find new locations that they can afford. This case arises out of such a situation in which the circumstances have been complicated by the landlord’s claim that it suffered damage well beyond the normal increase in rent (use and occupation).
This matter was tried before the court without a jury and presents two issues for the court’s…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Adams v. . City of CohoesNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Vinson v. Greenburgh Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
- Nodine v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1948
- Cox v. SammisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re Andover Togs, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Lund v. Chemical BankDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- Rubin v. DondyshCivil Court of the City of New York · 1989
- 437 Madison Avenue Associates v. A. T. Kearney, Inc.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1985
- 650 Park Avenue Corp. v. McRaeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987