Legal Opinion

State, Nevada Department of Taxation v. Kelly-Ryan, Inc.

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1994No. 24421PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

FACTS

In 1987, Reynolds Electrical and Engineering Company, Inc. (“REEco”) was acting as a prime contracting agent of the United States Government/Department of Energy. In this capacity, REEco solicited bids for the construction of a modular housing complex on the Tonopah Test Range in Nye County, Nevada. The construction site was located on federal land.

REEco sent a bid request to respondent Kelly-Ryan, Inc. (“Kelly-Ryan”), a Washington State general contractor. Before submitting its bid, Kelly-Ryan wrote a letter to the Nevada Department of Taxation seeking advice on the state…

3Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. New MexicoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Kern-Limerick, Inc. v. ScurlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. United States v. BoydSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. United States v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Washington v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by14 opinions

  1. State, Department of Taxation v. Masco Builder Cabinet GroupNevada Supreme Court · 2011
  2. State Tax Commission v. NEVADA CEMENT COMPANYNevada Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Sparks Nugget, Inc. v. State Ex Rel. Department of TaxationNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Harrah's v. State, Dep't of TaxationNevada Supreme Court · 2014
  5. In re Discipline of SerotaNevada Supreme Court · 2013

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API