Grays Ferry Cogeneration Partnership v. PECO Energy Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
DALZELL, District Judge.
Alleging that a $158 million power generation enterprise will in a matter of weeks go out of business by reason of its primary customer’s wrongdoing, plaintiffs on March 9, 1998 filed this action and a motion for preliminary injunction to prevent this feared catastrophe.
Specifically, plaintiffs Grays Ferry Cogeneration Partnership (“Grays Ferry”), TrigenSchuylkill Cogeneration, Inc. (“TrigenSchuylkill”), NRGG (Schuylkill) Cogeneration, Inc. (“NRGG”), and Trigen-Philadelphia Energy Corporation (“Trigen-Philadelphia”) seek a preliminary injunction enjoining…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Werner v. Plater-ZyberkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Horowitz v. Marlton Oncology, P.C.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1999
- Carter v. Philip Morris Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000