Legal Opinion

Grays Ferry Cogeneration Partnership v. PECO Energy Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 19, 1998No. Civil Action 98-1243PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

DALZELL, District Judge.

Alleging that a $158 million power generation enterprise will in a matter of weeks go out of business by reason of its primary customer’s wrongdoing, plaintiffs on March 9, 1998 filed this action and a motion for preliminary injunction to prevent this feared catastrophe.

Specifically, plaintiffs Grays Ferry Cogeneration Partnership (“Grays Ferry”), TrigenSchuylkill Cogeneration, Inc. (“TrigenSchuylkill”), NRGG (Schuylkill) Cogeneration, Inc. (“NRGG”), and Trigen-Philadelphia Energy Corporation (“Trigen-Philadelphia”) seek a preliminary injunction enjoining…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Werner v. Plater-ZyberkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Horowitz v. Marlton Oncology, P.C.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1999
  3. Carter v. Philip Morris Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API