Legal Opinion

Hunt v. Morris

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 28, 1932No. Gen. No. 35,720PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McSurely

Complainant filed her bill seeking to set aside the will of John Barnes, deceased, alleging that she was his daughter and only heir at law. The issue of this relationship was heard by the chancellor who held that she was not his daughter and heir at law and hence was not “person interested,” to which class of persons the right to contest the validity of a will is limited by section 7, chapter 148, Statute of Wills, Cahill’s St. ch. 148, fi 7, her bill was ordered dismissed and she appeals from this order. The section under which the proceeding was brought is, in part, as follows :

“That if any…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Morrison v. FlowersIllinois Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Healea v. VerneIllinois Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Anderson v. AndersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Dowling v. GillilandIllinois Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Lewandowski v. ZuzakIllinois Supreme Court · 1922

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. First National Bank & Trust Co. v. SeversonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  2. Yung v. PeloquinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API