General Bronze Corp. v. Cupples Products Corp.
District Court, E.D. Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
HULEN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs ask permission to file a supplemental complaint under Rule 15(d), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., by which infringement of a patent, granted subsequent to filing the original complaint, is charged against defendant. Defendants resist the move, claiming the supplemental complaint would introduce a new and independent cause of action. It is conceded it does. Should the new pleading be permitted?
The complaint charges defendants with patent infringement and unfair business practices with respect to six letters patent, *270the last one issued December 8,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Dugas v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- City of Texarkana v. Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Berssenbrugge v. Luce Mfg. Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1939
- Southern Pac. Co. v. ConwayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
- Fierstein v. Piper Aircraft CorporationDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1948
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Black v. BlackSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1977