Legal Opinion

Fierstein v. Piper Aircraft Corporation

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 1, 1948No. Civ. A. 2974PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WATSON, District Judge.

The Plaintiff in her complaint alleges that on August 17, 1946, at the Chemung County Airport, Elmira, New York,'a collision of a Piper Super Cruiser and a Navy Glider, caused by the negligence of an employee agent and servant of the Piper Aircraft Corporation, resulted in the death of Stanley C. Fierstein. Plaintiff’s claim for relief is based on the New York Decedent Estate Law, Consol.Laws, c. 13, Art. 5, Sec. 130:

“The executor or administrator duly appointed in this state, or in any other state, territory or district of the United States, or in any foreign country,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. WulfSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. KinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. Rosenzweig v. HellerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  4. Van Doren v. Pennsylvania R.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1899
  5. Hartmann v. Time, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1946

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Charles L. Longbottom and Nancy Sue Chapman v. Roy Ralph Swaby, a Minor, by His Next Friend, Harold F. EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
  2. Estate of Thompson v. Mercedes-Benz, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Adams v. Beland Realty CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1960
  4. Smith v. Piper Aircraft Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1955
  5. Love v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API