Legal Opinion

Clayton-Brame v. LOS ANGELES COUNTY DHS

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 8, 2001No. B136679Published

1Opinion of the Court

106 Cal.Rptr.2d 806 (2001)

88 Cal.App.4th 1344

Patricia CLAYTON-BRAME, Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES, Defendant and Appellant.

No. B136679.

Court of Appeal, Second District, Division Five.

May 10, 2001.

Rehearing Denied May 29, 2001.

Review Granted August 8, 2001.

Lloyd W. Pellman, County Counsel, Monica M. Mauricette, Deputy County Counsel, for Defendant and Appellant.

Van Bourg, Weinberg, Roger & Rosenfeld, Anne I. Yen, James Rutkowski, and James G. Varga, Los Angeles, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

TURNER, P.J.

I. INTRODUCTION

This appeal is from a judgment…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. Transportation Management Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Sure-Tan, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs v. Greenwich CollieriesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API