United States v. Angel
U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review
1DissentByrne, Chief Judge
The military judge was correct when he held that the speedy trial clock under R.C. M. 707(a) did not begin to run until 1 May 1987 — the day that the appellant was personally informed and officially notified by the trial counsel of the preferred charges.
I
Informing the Accused of Charges and Speedy Trial Accountability: Long-Term Interrelationship
There are two significant events involved in this issue, both of which have their own separate significance but which have been interrelated for at least 28 years:
a. Informing the accused of the nature of the charges against him; and
b. The formal…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. LovascoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Albrecht v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- United States v. BurtonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1971
- United States v. SmithUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1962
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.