Topp Copy Products, Inc. v. Singletary
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1DissentMontemuro, Justice
Because I cannot fathom how the words “any and all liability” can be determined to be words of general import in one case, and words of precision in another, I dissent.
As the majority correctly notes, an exculpatory clause will be valid where three conditions are satisfied: (1) the clause does not violate any public policy; (2) the contract relates entirely to the private affairs of the parties; and (3) the contract is not a contract of adhesion to which one party simply adheres to a contract because he has no power to alter it. Kotwasinski v. Rasner, 436 Pa. 32, 258 A.2d at 865 (1969). Even…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Neville Chemical Company v. Union Carbide CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- Perry v. PayneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
- Dilks v. Flohr ChevroletSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Employers Liability Assurance Corp. v. Greenville Business Men's Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Ruzzi v. Butler Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.