Legal Opinion

Carlson v. City of Dunes City

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 28, 1996No. LUBA No. 95-020; LUBA No. 95-023; CA A90746Published

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, P. J.

Petitioners seek review of LUBA’s decision remanding on one ground, but rejecting most of petitioners’ contentions concerning the City of Dunes City’s approval of respondents Wilkes’ and Robbins’ (collectively respondents) tentative plat for a subdivision. We reverse.

In 1966, the city adopted ordinance 15, which purported to annex an area that includes the proposed subdivision location. It is unclear what became of the proposed annexation, but there is no record that the procedures for recording and filing the appropriate documentation with county and state officials were completed. It is…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Clark v. Jackson CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  2. 1000 Friends of Oregon v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Friends of Oregon v. LCDC (Curry Co.)Oregon Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Friends of Neabeack Hill v. City of PhilomathCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  5. Ramsey v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API