Legal Opinion

Contreraz v. Michelotti-Sawyers

Montana Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1995No. 94-370PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Leajphart

Maria Contreraz (Maria) and eight family members (Appellants) appeal from an order of the Thirteenth Judicial District, Yellowstone County, granting Respondents’ motion for summary judgment. The District Court concluded (1) that Appellants are not entitled to emotional distress damages resulting from Respondents’ improper embalming of Appellants’ mother’s body; (2) that Appellants are not entitled to emotional distress damages for breach of contract; and (3) that Appellants are not entitled to recover damages for breach of contract. We reverse in part and affirm in part.

FACTS

The Parties

Basilia…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Christensen v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Sacco v. High Country Independent Press, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Scarpaci v. Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Meech v. Hillhaven West, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Corrigal v. Ball & Dodd Funeral Home, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1978

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Cummings v. Premier Rehab KellerSupreme Court of the United States · 2022
  2. Maloney v. Home and Investment Center, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Guth v. FreelandHawaii Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Larry Semenza v. Don KnissMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Jackson v. McKay-Davis Funeral Home, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2011

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API