Legal Opinion

Kirkendohl v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 21, 1961No. 39220PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jordan, Judge.

Under the decisions of this court in the cases of Service Fire Ins. Co. v. Powell, 70 Ga. App. 213 (27 SE2d 896); Clark v. American Cas. Co., 96 Ga. App. 328 (99 SE2d 897); and Coleman v. State Farm &c. Ins. Co., 104 Ga. App. 328 (3) (121 SE2d 833), the plaintiff’s petition clearly stated a cause of action against the defendant for breach of the provisions of the loan receipt. As stated by the court in headnote 3 of the Coleman case, supra, “An insured can not be permitted, after accepting money under a loan receipt, to breach the terms of the loan receipt by settling the claim…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wellmaker v. WheatleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  2. James v. TarpleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
  3. Bennett v. DoveCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
  4. Clark v. American Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
  5. Coleman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. American Chain & Cable Co. v. BrunsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  2. Hall v. HelmsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API