Legal Opinion

Security Pacific National Bank v. Kazian

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 30, 1976No. Civ. No. 47338PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*800Opinion

KAUS, P. J.

Petitioner, executor of the will of Angelen Gendian Razian, filed a petition for a decree determining the interests in decedent’s estate. Its purpose was to determine whether decedent’s surviving husband, Onig (Bill) Razian, had forfeited his interest in the estate under a no-contest clause in the will. The probate court found that Razian had contested decedent’s disposition of her estate and that he was therefore entitled to take only the sum of $1 under the will. Razian appeals.

Facts

Decedent married Razian in October 1954, sometime after her first husband died. At the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Estate of RussellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Hembree v. QuinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Smithsonian Institution v. MeechSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  5. Estate of DodgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Estate of KazianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  2. In Re the Estate of Shunji Kay IkutaHawaii Supreme Court · 1981
  3. In Re the Estate of Shunji Kay IkutaHawaii Supreme Court · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API