Legal Opinion · Dissent

In Re the Estate of Shunji Kay Ikuta

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1981No. 6175Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION OF

FONG, CIRCUIT JUDGE

I dissent.

I must respectfully disagree with the majority of this court with respect to the rationale and results it reached on the forfeiture issue. I believe that this court improperly handled the forfeiture issue when it summarily held that: (1) the actions of the Appellants, Clyde, Michael, and Robert Ikuta were in the nature of construing the will; and (2) the lower court was empowered to appoint an additional trustee as the circumstances were such that the appointment of such additional trustee was conducive to the better administration of the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Estate of HiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Friend's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
  3. In Re Estate of CocklinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1945
  4. Rudd v. SearlesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  5. Boettcher v. BusseWashington Supreme Court · 1954

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API