Legal Opinion
Cooper v. Rust Engineering Co.
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
Decided April 18, 1949No. Nos. 326, 374PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SWINFORD, District Judge.
The plaintiffs brought these actions under the Act of Congress known as the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended, which is Sections 201 to 219, Title 29 U.S.C.A.
The defendant, a construction company by which all the plaintiffs were employed, was engaged near Paducah, Kentucky, in the construction of a defense plant to be *150used for the manufacture of explosives for use by the United States Government in the prosecution of World War II. All of the work of the plaintiffs was during the war period while the war was in active progress. The plant was constructed on…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- A. B. Kirschbaum Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Walling v. Jacksonville Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- McLeod v. ThrelkeldSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Kennedy v. Silas Mason Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Warren-Bradshaw Drilling Co. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cooper v. Rust Engineering Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1950
- Hartmaier v. LongSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
- Aubuchon v. FrazierDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1951
- W. M. Cooper, James T. Ballance, Edith Smithers Lewis v. Rust Engineering CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1950