Legal Opinion

Groebl v. Walker

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 22, 1978No. 5187PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

McCLOUD, Chief Justice.

The issue is whether under the facts presented interest charges are a part of “the costs of drilling, testing, completing and equipping” certain oil wells drilled pursuant to a written agreement and assignment.

On November 8, 1962, W. C. Kinkel assigned to Ted 0. Groebl, A. E. Walker, Sr., and A. E. Walker, Jr., two oil and gas leases. Thereafter, on December 17, 1962, A. E. Walker, Sr., A. E. Walker, Jr., and Ted 0. Groebl executed an “Assignment and Agreement” whereby the Walkers assigned to Groebl all of “their right, title and interest” in the two leases, “SAVE AND…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cox v. DavisonTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Barker v. TorreyTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Maryland Casualty Co. v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Carter v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API