Legal Opinion

American Graphophone Co. v. Gimbel Bros.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 2, 1916No. 11/176PublishedCited by 4 opinions

In Equity. Suit by the American Graphophone Company against Gimbel Bros. On final hearing. Decree for defendant

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, District Judge.

This is the usual bill in equity, charging the defendant with infringement by sale of a talking-machine known as “The Keen-O-Phone” of seven letters patent of the United States, as follows: The Phillips patent, No. 623,925, dated September 12, 1899; the Hawthorne patent, No. 671,625, dated April 9, 1901; the Sheble patent, No. 730,169, dated June 2, 1903; the Emerson patent, No. 777,615, dated December 13, 1904; the Macdonald patent, No. 830,446, dated September 4, 1906; the Kraemer patent, No. 899,874, dated September 29, 1908; and the Macdonald patent, No. 957,694,…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Atlantic Works v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Boyden Power-Brake Co. v. Westinghouse Westinghouse v. Boyden Power-Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. Miller v. Eagle Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. Brown v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  5. Westinghouse v. Boyden Power Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Diamond Match Co. v. Sun Match Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1925
  2. Chandler v. Cutler-Hammer, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1940
  3. Koratron Company, Inc., a Corporation v. Lion Uniform, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
  4. Crystal Percolator Co. v. Landers, Frary & ClarkDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API