Legal Opinion

United States v. Jeffrey Floyd Roberts, Richard Allen Lumbar, Bradley Dennis Goodsky, and Ernest Donald Drift

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided June 21, 1988No. 86-5482 MN to 86-5485 MNPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FAIRCHILD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Defendants-appellants Ernest Drift, Bradley Goodsky, Richard Lumbar, and Jeffrey Roberts were convicted after a jury trial of bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). They appeal from their judgments of conviction. 1 We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. After careful consideration of appellants’ arguments, we affirm.

The convictions arise out of the July 21, 1986 robbery of Marquette Bank University (the bank), the Dinkytown Branch of Marquette Bank, in Minneapolis. Since, among other complaints, defendants have challenged the sufficiency…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Francis v. FranklinSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. County Court of Ulster Cty. v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Schneble v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. United States v. Donald Laverne Carlson, United States of America v. Gary Clarend HofstadCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. HannaWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Holder v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991
  3. Thomas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2001
  4. United States v. Donald Lee Earles and Catherine PapajohnCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
  5. Moorman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1990

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API