Legal Opinion

In Re the Marriage of Hankenson

Court of Appeals of Iowa

Decided May 25, 1993No. 92-453PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAYDEN, Judge.

Appellant Chris Hankenson appeals a trial court judgment which found appellee Richard Hankenson not to be in contempt for failing to pay postsecondary education expenses of the parties’ oldest child. We affirm.

The marriage of Chris and Richard Hankenson was dissolved by decree on February 8, 1985. The district court awarded substantial child support and alimony payments to Chris. The decree also provided Richard was obligated to provide financial assistance for the postsecondary education needs of the parties’ five children. Specifically, the decree required Richard to pay the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of CastleCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1981
  2. In Re the Marriage of GilesCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1983
  3. In Re the Marriage of WegnerCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1990

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of EilersCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1994
  2. In Re the Marriage of DolterCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2002
  3. Daniel Lee Jensen v. Karla Ruth BaccamCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2021
  4. In re the Marriage of DewhurstCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2024
  5. In re the Marriage of JonesCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API