Legal Opinion

Bates v. Henneberry

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided April 30, 2009No. 08CA1477PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge WEBB.

In this Medicaid benefits case, we conclude that the Medicaid Act sections on which plaintiff, Ella Mae Bates, relies do not contain rights-creating language essential to enforcement under 42 U.S.C. section 1983 and that her section 24-4-106, C.R.S.2008, claim is untimely. 1 Therefore, we affirm the trial court's judgment dismissing her section 1983 claims and her claim for judicial review of administrative action, in favor of defendants, the Colorado Department of Health Care Policy and Financing (Department); Joan Henneberry, executive director of the Department; Sarah…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Gonzaga University v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Blessing v. FreestoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Hill v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Wilder v. Virginia Hospital Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sterling Ethanol, LLC v. Colorado Air Quality Control CommissionColorado Court of Appeals · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API