Legal Opinion

Keenan v. Peterson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 24, 1988No. 87-C-11214; CA A46668PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from an order denying habeas corpus relief. Petitioner, an inmate of the Oregon State Correctional Institution (OSCI), is under indictment for aggravated murder. He is permitted to communicate with his attorney by a telephone that is monitored by OSCI staff. He contends that such monitoring interferes with his right to confidential communication with his attorney. We affirm.

The trial court found that OSCI does not monitor calls between inmates and their attorneys1 and that petitioner has not shown that he is in any way being deprived of his right to confer privately with his…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Procunier v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Keenan v. PetersonOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Barrett v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API