Legal Opinion
Seaner v. Schimke
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided May 30, 1995No. 1:94-cr-00095PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
HECKMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
The parties have consented, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), to have the undersigned conduct all further proceedings in this case, including entry of judgment. Pending before the court is plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment (Item 15). In response to plaintiffs’ motion, defendants have moved for summary judgment (Items 20 & 25).
For the reasons set forth below, defendants’ motions are granted ’ and plaintiffs’ motion is denied.
BACKGROUND
The plaintiffs, Wilfred Capell, by his Conservator Elizabeth Seaner, and Millard Fillmore Hospital…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Chase v. New York State Department of Social ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Green Manor Associates v. BeaudoinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001