Legal Opinion

Spencer v. Rowe

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 9, 1911PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Trover'. Before Judge Brand. Gwinnett superior court. January 22, 1910.

1Opinion of the CourtEish, C. J.

A verdict was rendered for the plaintiff. The judgment of the trial court overruling the defendant’s' motiop for a new trial was reversed by the Supreme Court, on account of an erroneous instruction given to the juj-y. Rowe v. Spencer, 132 Ga. 426 (64 S. E. 468). Upon a second trial a verdict was again rendered in favor of the plaintiff. The trial judge granted a new trial. This was the first exercise of his discretion in granting a new trial. As the verdict under the evidence and the law applicable thereto was not demanded, there was no abuse of discretion by the trial judge, and his…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rowe v. SpencerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  2. Kuhnen v. Postal Telegraph-Cable Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1910

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Throgmorton v. TrammellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
  2. Reese v. BakerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  3. Puckett v. HeatonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API