Legal Opinion
Reese v. Baker
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided February 9, 1944No. 14765PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Atkinson, Justice.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) The first question for determination is whether the court erred in not dismissing the motion for new trial. The plaintiffs in error contend that the suit was against both Eobert Eeese and A. D. Moore, and that notwithstanding there was an agreement on the trial to submit to the jury only the question whether Victor Baker’s one-fourth interest in the 1-1/2-acre lot should be subjected to the payment of the funeral expenses claimed by A. D. Moore; yet, the verdict being in favor of the defendants, Eobert Eeese and A. D. Moore, as against…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Robinson v. WilkinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884
- Central Railroad & Banking Co. v. KentSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
- Ross v. RamboSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
- Baker v. MooreSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
- Kuhnen v. Postal Telegraph-Cable Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1910
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Throgmorton v. TrammellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
- Azar v. THUMA, Alias THOMASSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
- Tri-State Augusta, Inc. v. Woodward Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
- Green v. StaffordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1959