Parker v. State
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Herd, J.:
This is an original habeas corpus action. Daniel L. Parker filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus on December 22, 1989, seeking release from confinement. Subsequent to filing the petition, Parker was reparoled and released from confinement, whereupon the State filed a motion for dismissal on the basis of mootness. Parker contends the issue is not moot because he was denied due process by an illegal parole revocation hearing and is therefore entitled to his original parole terms. We ordered the parties to file briefs.
The facts from which…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Dale H. Sutherland v. Cecil McCall Chairman, United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- William Heirens v. Larry MizellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Ronald Leroy Schuemann v. Colorado State Board of Adult Parole J. D. MacFarlaneCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
- Oscar Cornelius Goodman v. Thomas F. KeohaneCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. CarrSupreme Court of Kansas · 2002
- State v. AlemanCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1992
- Hudson v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2002
- Templeton v. Kansas Parole BoardCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2000
- Adams v. Kansas Parole BoardCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.