United States v. Jimmy Hilton, Jr.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BARBARA MILANO KEENAN, Circuit Judge:
In this appeal, Jacqueline, Tamatha, and Jimmy Hilton (collectively, the defendants) challenge their convictions on charges involving a scheme to defraud The Woodsmiths Company (Woodsmiths, or the company), a small North Carolina furniture manufacturer that was Tamatha Hilton’s employer. The primary issue before us is whether the statutes prohibiting identity theft and aggravated identity theft, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1028(a)(7) and 1028A, under which Jimmy Hilton and Jacqueline Hilton were convicted, encompass the theft of the identity of a corporation. We…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- McKaskle v. WigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. LanierSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- United States v. Trey CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022
- United States v. Dylann RoofCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2021
- United States v. Nathan LumbardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- Ruffin v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- United States v. Under SealCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.