Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Isbell v. Kelso
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided May 22, 1969No. 8935PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRELIMINARY WRIT OF PROHIBITION MADE ABSOLUTE
TITUS, Judge.
The preliminary writ which was issued and duly served in this original proceeding in prohibition commanded respondent, inter alia, to appear before this court on May 19, 1969, and show cause, if any, why the preliminary writ of prohibition should not be made permanent. Respondent has not made a return to the prelimi*164nary order nor directed a motion to the petition for the writ within the time specified. Consequently, we deem all material matters set forth in relator’s petition to be confessed and admitted. State ex rel. McCubbin v.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Christie v. BD. OF REGENTS UNIVERSITY REGENTSMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
- State Ex Rel. Cummings v. WitthausSupreme Court of Missouri · 1949
- State Ex Rel. Houser v. GoodmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1966
- State Ex Rel. McCubbin v. McMillianMissouri Court of Appeals · 1961
- State Ex Rel. Bush v. ElliottSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Thomasville Wood Products, Inc. v. BufordMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
- State ex rel. Thurman v. FranklinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
- Foster v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 1980