Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Thurman v. Franklin

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 7, 1991No. 17153PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHRUM, Judge.

This is an original proceeding in prohibition. We must decide if our preliminary order to respondent Circuit Judge James A. Franklin Jr. should be made absolute. Our preliminary order prohibited the respondent from enforcing his order that the Henry County sheriff testify at deposition concerning his knowledge of arrests of Howard M. Bradley. The sheriff claimed he could not answer the questions because Bradley’s arrest records are closed to the public. We have concluded that the sheriff may testify about Bradley’s arrests to the extent that his knowledge is in no way derived…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Community Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1988
  2. Kilbane v. Director of the Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  3. State Ex Rel. Cain v. BarkerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  4. State v. MorowitzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  5. State Ex Rel. Gonzenbach v. EberweinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gamble v. BrowningMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. State ex rel. Fusselman v. BeltMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API