Legal Opinion

King v. Moore

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided October 31, 1952No. 7846PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GLADNEY, Judge.

Appellant instituted this suit to recover damages for an alleged misrepresentation as to the year and model of a certain automobile he purchased at appellee’s place of business.

Plaintiff, on March 7, 1950, visited the lot of the Moore Car Sales in Bossier City, Louisiana, for the purpose of buying a “used automobile”. He was approached by Max Hanna, a salesman for Hubert L. Moore, the owner of Moore Car Sales. As a result of this visit King purchased a Packard automobile for the sum of $2,495. Upon the completion of the transaction, a 'bill of sale was delivered by Hanna to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kardis v. BarrereLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1931
  2. Barnidge v. Cappel Motor Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1930
  3. Cockrell v. Capital City Auto Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1925
  4. Violette v. Capital City Auto Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1926

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Broussard v. BreauxLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1982
  2. Fusilier v. ArdoinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1972
  3. Abraham v. Dalworth Machinery Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API