Hagerman v. Bates
Colorado Court of Appeals
Appeal from, the District Court of Arapahoe County.
1Opinion of the CourtBissell, P. J.
Where there is any suggestion of laches in the record, bills for specific performance are governed so absolutely by their own peculiar conditions as to require more than the usual consideration of the facts which make up the history of the controversy.
Disregarding the differences, whether significant or immaterial, between the original bill and its various amendments, the complaint charged generally the execution of an agreement on the 27th day of July, 1882, between the owners of the Little Giant and Bonnybel mining claims, for the division of the area in conflict between the two properties.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Twin-Lick Oil Co. v. MarburySupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Galliher v. CadwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Johnston v. Standard Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Badger v. BadgerSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
- Sullivan v. Portland & Kennebec RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Jackson v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1909
- Yampa Valley Coal Co. v. VelottaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928
- Gay v. HavermaleWashington Supreme Court · 1902
- Bower v. PoundSupreme Court of Colorado · 1920
- Elliott v. ElliottDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1907
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.