Legal Opinion · Dissent

Angamarca v. New York City Partnership Housing Development Fund, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 21, 2011Published

1Dissent

Tom, J.E (dissenting in part).

I respectfully take issue with the proposition expounded by the majority in this case that an alien worker’s lack of permanent resident status is immaterial to his recovery of the cost of future medical treatment. The majority’s conclusion that the immigration status of plaintiff is irrelevant to the award of damages for future medical expenses represents a wholly unwarranted extension of the Court of Appeals’ ruling in Balbuena v IDR Realty LLC (6 NY3d 338 [2006]). It is a plaintiffs burden in a personal injury action to establish all elements of his or her…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sharapata v. Town of IslipNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Balbuena v. IDR REALTY LLCNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Sharapata v. Town of IslipAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  4. Tate v. ColabelloNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Katz Park Avenue Corp. v. JaggerNew York Court of Appeals · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API